Here are a selection of comments received via Email not all bad. HSP modems seem to run better on an Intel chip rather than a Cyrix but I have just received an Email from PCTel to say there is an upgraded Cyrix driver which is out now on my homepage.
Hi Glen
First I like to thank you on providing the HSP PCtel Modem driver
for Windows NT.
Dear Glen, I just got a new system cobbled together by a mate of mine. It's an AMD K6 166 and he had to plug in the terrible PCtel HSP modem. I even tried out the Intel MMX drivers. The damned thing kept disconnecting me from the Net no matter what I did. I was advised to take the latest drivers off the Net and be gentle with the modem, and if that could tide me over, wait for better drivers! Then I came across your Webpage, which finally explained what HSP meant and why I want to headbutt PCtel for coming up with such dumb ideas. Advice to anyone with a K6 planning on a modem - AVOID THE HSP MODEM LIKE THE PLAGUE! It'll ruin your Netlife, throttle your PC and cause sleepless nights. Of course, if you have found this page, you know that by now. My HSP modem is an
"Aztech" bundled with a Zenon PC. The modem is
incredibly slow, but when I finally connected "PCTel"
to their website and found out what HSP is, I see why it could be
slower. But I don't understand why it is SOOOOO slow. Read your web site at work
today after a long week trying to get connected with a PCTel
modem. The new drivers for Cyrix chips have done the trick for me
though I am still considering returning the modem. I bought a
Cyrix P150+ from Computer Trading back in November with the modem
pre-installed (no idea what make!!) and they have agreed to
replace it if I so wish. Anyway I am writing to thank you for
posting this information - you helped me out enormously. The page is the end of a long search for me. Being new to the
internet I have been thinking it was me who couldn't find the
Micom Home Page! I have a P166 K5 AMD chip which works fine (I
think!) The connection speed is always 28.8 though. Following a nightmare trying to
get the damned thing working, solved by downloading the drivers
from your site and a bit of trial and error with cabling, I find
that the modem works very well, even allowing some multitasking,
although I usually only have my browser running while I surf. I
got the thing for 30 pounds from a local distributors
"bargain bin" and was seriously beginning to wonder if
it was such a bargain. I must now say that I am actually quite
pleased with it ! I did have some problems accessing Zetnet and a
number of other sites, but they went when I binned Explorer,
which I can only assume was causing some conflict with Navigator
(2.2) We have been fussing around
with this pctel modem and some old drivers. Now i've installed
the drivers from your site everything works fast and smooth! Glen: Thanks for putting together
this page as I am now on my third modem. They seem to work fine
for a while then slow down everything until my pentium 133 ,
32meg EDO, 512k cache full bells and whistles machine locks up
totally. Also thanks for the info about Virge cards I'll try it
out and get back to you. Hopefully I can find the latest drivers
for my machine somewhere on the 'net (if you know where the
please mail me) Hello from the USA. Hi Glen, Hi HELP!! Thanks for the Web page on
MICOM modems, I've been trying to trace some technical support
ever since I purchased the Modem. The suppliers can't even
provide a contact number.They are still selling them and they are
now appearing in the small local computer shops. I purchased a Micom 33.6 modem
from Big Deal of Humberstone N.E.Lincs in Dec '96. I am connected
to prestel and get 28.8 most of the time. I am using a Intel 166
with a Virge based graphics card, so the new info on the Pctel
page about this has helped. I now get no dropped connections, and
in general quite good performance. However Pctel claims of
software upgrades is a bit far fetched, and I am thinking of
buying a US Robotics Sportster to upgrade to x2. Hi, have downloaded it, and it doesn't make any difference for me!!! Bought it recently, found it to be TOTALLY useless!!! Can get it to work slowly on some connections, (eg to send SMS messages to mobile phones) but have never managed to get it to connect to Zetnet yet AT ALL!!! Just won't talk and connect!!! The software that came with it I can't get to work - all in all, Useless!!! It's going back, and I will
stick with my 28800 modem for now!!! :-( Bye, Ian
Hi! Spotted your message on a zetnet.* newsgroup. I had the misfortune to have one of these modems for a while too, though my machine is an Intel P100/24MB RAM. I could not get 16 or 32 bit Trumpet Winsock to work whatsoever, and after a harrowing 48 hours, I exchanged it for a 33.6K Rockwell chipset generic modem, which works brilliantly. Including you, I now know 6 past or present users, and none has connected to Zetnet easily or in some cases at all! A friend just asked me to specify bits for his PC that he was having made for him, and I said "any modem, preferably with Rockwell chipset, and not mentioning PCTel or HSP anywhere! How satisfactorily has your
alleged modem worked, and where did you get it from (if you don't
mind me asking!)? Lots of PC sellers seem to install this modem,
as it's just about the cheapest (and nastiest!) around right now.
This makes the problems even worse, as it's usually these people
who aren't "au fait" with modems and the net, and are
hence less qualified to solve problems! Best Regards, Tony I know two other people who bought this modem and we have all ended up sending them back for a cash refund as they just did not work properly on our Pentium PC's, very sloooow. I think we have all bought USR 33.6 Voice modems now, such is life. Regards ?
Regarding your question; honestly, the only time I felt a real drawback was when I used Microsoft Netmeeting or listened to RealAudio music together with other applications (MS Internet Explorer open as well, of course). There, you see that something is draining the power of the CPU. You see all commands executed in slow motion ! When I use other programs I don't need to get connected to the net, so there is no HSP to worry about. This may not be the case for other people who must keep running net dependent applications and they must realize that they are sacrificing a lot from their computers' processing power by using HSP type modems. Maybe in the future CPUs will be so fast that HSP type jobs will require minimal processing power. Then, it would be nice to have HSP - because of the cheap and easy upgrade feature. Regards, Tarik Hi Glen... I have a P100 intel chip, triton chipset motherboard, 32 EDO ram, 512 pipeline, 3.8gig Quantum, 2meg Diamond stealth....etc. The HSP modem runs almost like a 28 Rockwell... I expected to be able to upgrade it by software or have a performance increase if and when I upgrade my processor... anyhow when I looked at PCtel web page it seems the new HSP 56k modem is a new unit and that my 33.6 will I suppose be left by the wayside... This rush in technology and trying to future proof our hardware seems impossible.. but then again I must admit I love the ever improvements in PC technology... All the best John I bought a MICOM PCTel modem at
a computer fair, and set it up as recommended. I have a Cyrix
P150+ on an Intel PCI motherboard. It was a disaster; my PC was
basically crippled online. Nothing worked properly. Briefly, I
swapped the modem pronto for a full chipset Harmomy Rockwell 33.6
and now I'm getting great speed and all my Win95 software is
running fine. I would strongly advise DO NOT buy a reduced
chipset modem like the MICOM, especially if you have a non-Intel
CPU.
|